当前位置:

网站首页>文章详情

互联网+急性心肌梗死规范化快速救治体系对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治预后的影响

【PDF在线阅读】 【下载PDF】
  • Author:

  • Author Unit:

  • Keywords:

摘要:

目的 探讨互联网+急性心肌梗死规范化快速救治体系(ISRTS)对急性ST段抬高型心肌
梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)急救预后的影响。方法 采用回顾性非同期队列研究
方法。郑州市第一人民医院自2017年11月开始实施ISRTS及流程,选取未实施ISRTS之前的2017年4月至
2017年10月收治可行PCI的STEMI患者为对照组(106例),采用传统模式进行常规救治;选取2017年11
月至2018年5月收治可行PCI的STEMI患者为观察组(110例),采取ISRTS及流程进行救治。比较两组患
者的一般资料、快速反应指标、入院时病情程度指标、住院期间并发症、社会效益指标、术后6个月主
要不良心脏事件等。结果 观察组的快速反应指标(发病至呼救120时间、发病至首次心电图完成时间、
发病至入院时间、入院至首次心肌酶完成时间、入门-球囊扩张时间、首次医疗接触到血管开通时间)
均短于对照组(P均<0.001),入院时病情程度指标(cTnI、NT-proBNP、LVEF、LVESD、LVEDD、
hs-CRP)均轻于对照组(P均<0.01),主动脉球囊反搏应用率低于对照组(P<0.05),社会效益指标
(药占比、平均住院费用、平均住院时间、患者满意度)均优于对照组(P均<0.001),住院期间并发
症(心功能不全、心源性休克、室壁瘤、恶性心律失常及总并发症)发生率低于对照组(P均<0.05),
术后6个月主要不良心脏事件低于对照组(P<0.001)。结论 ISRTS建立优化STEMI救治流程,提高救治
效率,缩短心肌再灌注时间,减少并发症,有效改善STEMI患者的临床预后,创造了良好的社会效益。

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the influence of internet+standardized rapid treatment system (ISRTS)
for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on the prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction (STEMI) undergone PCI. Methods Retrospective non-synchronous cohort study was used in this study.
ISRTS and its procedure were carried out in the First People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou City on Nov. 2017. STEMI
patients with planed PCI (n=106) were chosen into control group before ISRTS from Apr. 2017 to Oct. 2017, and the
control group was given traditional treatment. STEMI patients with planed PCI (n=110) were chosen into observation
group from Nov. 2017 to May 2018, and the observation group was given ISRTS and its procedure. The general data,
rapid response indexes, indexes of disease severity at admission time, complications during hospitalization, social
efficacy indexes and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 6 months after the procedure were compared
between 2 groups. Results The rapid response indexes (the time from disease onset to call ambulance, time from
disease onset to finish of the first electrocardiogram (ECG) and admission, finishing time of the first myocardial
enzymes detection, door-to-balloon dilation time, time from the first medical contact to open blood vessels) were all
shorter in observation group than those in control group (all P<0.001). The indexes of disease severity at admission
time (cTnI, NT-proBNP, LVEF, LVESd, LVEDd, hs-CRP) were all milder, and application rate of intra-aortic
balloon pumps (IABP) was lower in observation group than those in control group (P<0.05). The social efficacy
indexes (drug proportion, average hospitalization cost, average hospitalization time and patient satisfaction) were
all superior in observation group to those in control group (all P<0.001). The incidence rates of complications
during hospitalization (cardiac insufficiency, cardiogenic shock, ventricular aneurysm, malignant arrhythmia and
total complications) were lower observation group than those in control group (all P<0.05). The incidence rate of

MACE was lower in observation group than that in control group (P<0.001). Conclusion ISRTS establishes and

optimizes STEMI treatment process, improves treatment efficiency, shortens myocardial reperfusion time, reduces
complications, effectively improves the clinical prognosis in STEMI patients, and creates good social benefits.

基金项目:

河南省郑州市科技惠民计划项目(172PKJHM347)

参考文献:

[1] Wadhera RK,Joynt Maddox KE,Wasfy JH,et al. Association of the
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Mortality Among
Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial
Infarction, and Pneumonia[J]. JAMA,2018,320(24):2542-52.
[2] Vergara R,Valenti R,Migliorini A,et al. Clinical and Angiographic
Outcomes Comparison of Patients With Left Main Vs Non-Left Main
Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,
2018,30(12):443-6.
[3] Lima MSM,Dantas RAN,Mendes NPDN,et al. Clinical-epidemiological
aspects of patients submitted to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in
a university hospital[J]. Rev Bras Enferm,2018,71(6):2883-90.
[4] Kim YH,Her AY,Rha SW,et al. Five-year major clinical outcomes
between first-generation and second-generation drug-eluting stents
in acute myocardial infarction patients underwent percutaneous
coronary intervention[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol,2018,15(8):523-33.
[5] 洪涛. 欧洲心脏病学会2017版急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治
疗指南更新之我见[J]. 中国介入心脏病学杂志,2017,25(9):483-5.
[6] 中华医学会心血管病分会介入心脏病学组,中国医师协会心血管
病内科医师分会血栓防治专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑
委员会. 中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南(2016)[J]. 中华心血管
病杂志,2016,44(5):382-400.
[7] 贾嘉,张玉龙. 中国心肺复苏?心脏除颤团体标准与中国胸痛中心
建设与评估团体标准成功发布[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂
志,2018,13(9):831-2.
[ 8 ] 刘璇, 李树仁, 杨国慧, 等. 胸痛中心建设对急性S T 段抬高
型心肌梗死患者救治的影响[ J ] . 中国介入心脏病学杂
志,2018,26(11):622-6.
[9] 中国老年医学学会心血管病分会. 高龄老年(≥75岁)急性冠
状动脉综合征患者规范化诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂
志,2018,33(8):732-50.
[10] 王世磊,陶贵周. 绿色通道急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性ST
段抬高型心肌梗死患者就诊时间和预后的影响[J]. 中国循环杂
志,2017,32(z1):92.
[11] González-Montero J,Brito R,Gajardo AI,et al. Myocardial reperfusion
injury and oxidative stress: Therapeutic opportunities[J]. World J
Cardiol,2018,10(9):74-86.
[12] 李睿,栾波,段娜,等. 辽西地区农村和城镇急性心肌梗死患者就诊
现状对比分析[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志,2018,10(11):1328-31.
[13] 陈凤英. 急性ST段抬高心肌梗死的救治及中国经皮冠状动脉
介入治疗指南(2016)要点解读[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志,2016,
25(7):857-61.
[14] Anroedh SS,Kardys I,Akkerhuis KM,et al. e-Transmission of ECGs
for expert consultation results in improved triage and treatment of
patients with acute ischaemic chest pain by ambulance paramedics[J].
Neth Heart J,2018,26(11):562-71.
  • 2008

  • 1

通讯地址:北京市东城区东四十条南门仓5号
电话: 237499284 邮编:100700
网址:www.ebcvm..org Email: ebcvm_cj@126.com

copyright © 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》编辑部
当您在使用本网站投稿遇到困难时,
请直接将稿件投送到编辑部邮箱ebcvm_cj@126.com